place holder graphic Legal Solutions. place holder graphic place holder graphic place holder graphic place holder graphic
spacer graphic Trademarked Logo for Jefferson Coulter, PLLC Because Ideas Don't Protect Themselves (TM) graphic of keyhole place holder graphic place holder graphic
place holder graphic place holder graphic
place holder graphic Areas of Practice
place holder graphic News and Information
place holder graphic About Us
place holder graphic Contact Us
place holder graphic Contact Us
Copyright or Wrong®
The Jefferson Coulter Blog: Copyright Law and Policy

Google Ordered to turn over YouTube data to Viacom

In the latest ruling issued on July 1, 2008, by Federal District Court Judge, Louis L. Stanton in the Viacom v. YouTube case, Google was ordered to turn over the  copies of all videos that were once available for public viewing on YouTube.com but later  removed for any reason and all data from YouTube’s logging database concerning each time a YouTube video has been viewed on the YouTube website or through embedding on a third-party website.

Google argued that the data should not be disclosed because of the users’ privacy concerns, saying that “Plaintiffs would likely be able to determine the viewing and video uploading habits of YouTube’s users based on the user’s login ID and the user’s IP address.” However, citing Google Public Policy’s own posting, stating that IP addresses alone should not be considered Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”) (Are IP addresses personal?), the Court found that IP addresses and anonymous user names were not enough information to implicate a sufficient privacy concern to prevent disclosure to Viacom.

Despite the fact that anonymous user names and IP addresses provide insufficient information to identify an individual, the negative publicity has sent Viacom on the PR offensive to let the world know that it’s not an overweening ogre, but just your average multibillion dollar content owner next door looking to protect its interests.

Viacom also made a play for “the computer source code which controls both the YouTube.com search function and Google’s internet search tool ‘Google.com’.”  Reason prevailed and this information was not ordered produced to Viacom.  Viacom had claimed it would use such information to determine whether YouTube was doing everything it could to prevent online copyright infringement. 

In a possible commentary on the near impossibility of preventing online copyright infringement, the Court noted that “If there is a way to write a program that can identify and thus control infringing videos, plaintiffs are free to demonstrate it.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply


place holder graphic spacer graphic

Copyright © 2008. Jefferson Coulter, PLLC. All rights reserved.

Attorney Blog Integration by Aldebaran Web Design Seattle

place holder graphic